The peer review process, long considered the bedrock of scholarly publishing, has often been criticized for its opacity and l...
Read more ⟶Traditional peer review has long been considered the gold standard in scholarly publishing. Yet, it is not without its limita...
Read more ⟶The Asian Council of Science Editors (ACSE) is delighted to announce the appointment of Emily Poznanski, Chief Executive Offi...
Read more ⟶Preventable desk rejections at journals are editor time-wasters and author heartbreakers; however, they're largely avoidabl...
Read more ⟶Peer review has been the cornerstone of academic publishing for decades, serving as a quality control mechanism for scholarl...
Read more ⟶As the academic community observes Peer Review Week (September 15–19) under the theme “Rethinking Peer Review in the AI E...
Read more ⟶Peer review sits at the heart of scholarly publishing. It serves as the crucial filter through which rigor is tested, credibi...
Read more ⟶In scholarly publishing, the question of who should be responsible for submitting a manuscript is often taken for granted. ...
Read more ⟶Throughout 2025, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is spotlighting Diamond Open Access (OA): journals that charge ...
Read more ⟶Guest-edited collections have long enriched scholarly publishing by adding depth, focus, and diverse perspectives to research...
Read more ⟶Trends in Scholarly Publishing is an international, double-blind, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to disseminating cutting-edge research, insightful reviews, industry updates, and informed opinions across the entire spectrum of scholarly communication and publishing. The journal publishes one issue per year and serves as a vital resource for academics, researchers, publishers, and industry professionals interested in the evolving landscape of scholarly publishing.