Loading...

Open Access Publishing: What’s Happening in India?

By  Kaushik Bharati Oct 23, 2025 33 0

India’s openaccess (OA) ecosystem is unusually diverse! It encompasses funder mandates and national repositories that coexist with society-run ‘Diamond’ journals, big-publisher ‘Gold’ and ‘Hybrid’ options, and a growing preprint culture. Since 2014, the India Government’s Department of Science and Technology (DST) and Department of Biotechnology (DBT) require that publications arising from their grants be made openly accessible through repository deposit, in line with the Green OA model. Likewise, the University Grants Commission (UGC) mandates that all theses should be deposited in the national thesis repository(Shodhganga), a component of the Information and Library Network (INFLIBNET). It is encouraging that over 600,000 freely available theses are now deposited in this repository, which is a milestone in itself. Moreover, the One Nation, One Subscription (ONOS) initiative, rolled out just this year,negotiates national read access to paywalled journals for publicly funded higher education institutions (HEIs) and R&D labs, which is reshaping discovery.

India’s Open Access Models

India primarily has four OA models, which include (i) Diamond or Platinum, (ii) Gold, (iii) Hybrid, and (iv) Green. Additionally, a preprint platform is also present, and public-sector OA journalsalso exist.

Many Indian scientific societies or publicly funded journals don’t charge any APC, making them especially attractive for early-career researchers. Journals under the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research – National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research (CSIR-NIScPR) fall in the Diamond OA category, which are exempted from APCs and subscription charges. Moreover, most Medknow journals follow the Platinum OA model, which allows immediate OA without APCs.

In the case of Gold OA, usually the funder or host institution pays the APC. An example in the Indian context is Springer Nature’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), India Section B: Biological Sciences.

The Hybrid OA model involves optional OAin a subscription journal. Many India-linked journals in large portfolios allow authors to choose an OA option inside otherwise paywalled titles, such as the PNAS India example indicated above.

The Green OA model involves self-archiving. This mandates deposition of accepted manuscripts in a repository in compliance with the 2014 DBT/DST OA Policy, whichapplies to all funded research. In this case, institutional repositories (IRs) can be used instead of Shodhganga, which caters exclusively to thesis archiving, as mentioned above. These include Delhi Indian Institute of Technology’s (IITD) IR, Delhi Technological University’s (DTU) IR (DSpace), and Indian Institute of Science’s (IISc) IR (ePrints@IISc), to name a few. The latter is India’s first and fastest-growing IR. Notably, these campus archives complement the national Shodhganga repository.

Besides the above major OA models, other options like preprint platforms also exist. It’s worth mentioning that India now has its own preprint platform (IndiaRxiv), which was launched in 2022, at the fag end of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a national preprint platform, now run by the Society for Promotion of Horticulture using Public Knowledge Project software. Preprints don’t replace peer review but speed up visibility and community feedback. Moreover, public-sector OA journals also exist. An important example is the Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR), which is fully OA and uses Creative Commons licensing (CC BY-NC-SA).

Challenges in Open Access Publishing in India
India’s OA scenario is vibrant, but there are real frictions for authors, editors, and libraries. Affordability of APC is a major issue, especially for young researchers. Studies consistently flag APCs as a barrier to publishing, especially in LMIC contexts. Notably, for many Indian labs, Gold or Hybrid OA fees are a binding constraint. There are also waiver eligibility gaps. Several publishers’ waiver schemes don’t automatically include India, which are often reserved for low-income or small-GDP countries. For example, Taylor & Francis’ current list shows India is not in its automatic waiver or discount groups.

Predatory publishing remains a reputational risk in India. The UGC-CARE initiative was launched to counter this. However, it has been discontinued from July this year, shifting to “suggestive parameters” as indicated by UGC.

Regarding DST and DBT mandates discussed above, implementation and monitoring are still mixed across institutions.Library community reviews highlight the need for more consistent national-level requirements and enforcement.

Preprints are growing, but unevenly normalized. IndiaRxiv provides national infrastructure, yet disciplinary acceptance varies, affecting evaluation and promotion. There is confusion regarding rights and licences. Surveys and audits show wide variation in licence choices among Indian OA journals.Many use NC or SA variants of OA, and in some cases, authors may not retain full rights. This creates uncertainty for data mining and reuse.

Sustainability of the Diamond OA is also a challenge. Although India benefits from many non-APC society and public-sector journals,editors still face resource constraints to maintain sustainability. In the case of repositories, metadata quality and consistency still vary across depositing institutions, affecting discoverability and linking.

Looking Ahead
India is moving towards easier access and smarter open publishing. Rollout of ONOS should make reading paywalled content simpler across campuses, but authors still need OA for reuse.With UGC dropping the CARE list, researchers will rely on basic quality checks regarding licensing, indexing, and archiving, instead of a whitelist.We can expect more targeted agreements that cover APCs for some institutions, while DST and DBT mandates push self-archiving with better metadata and ORCID.Preprints will likely become normal in more fields, and Diamond OA journals will need shared platforms and stable funding.Overall, the direction is towards a broader Open Science, where papers, data, and code will become openly reusable.

Keywords

Open access India Diamond OA Gold OA Hybrid OA Green OA preprints India One Nation One Subscription repository mandates

Kaushik Bharati
Kaushik Bharati

Dr. Kaushik Bharati is a Health Policy Consultant at UNESCO, New Delhi and former Consultant at WHO. He received his PhD from the Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine and post-doctoral fellowship from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK. He was formerly a Scientist at the National Institute of Immunology (NII), New Delhi and a Senior Program Officer at the Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (THSTI), NCR Delhi. He has also worked as a consultant for Global Health Strategies, New York, USA; Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France; Policy Cures, Sydney, Australia; the Science Advisory Board, Virginia, USA; and the Initiative against Diarrheal and Enteric diseases in Asia (IDEA), Lyon, France. His major research areas include Virology, Vaccinology, and Public Health. He has published 119 papers in reputed national and international journals and has also co-authored a book entitled “Basic Concepts in Immunology”. He has delivered numerous invited lectures at national and international conferences, including UK, USA, Thailand, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Indonesia, South Korea, Philippines, and Pakistan. He is currently on the Editorial Board of 34 journals from India, Sri Lanka, UK, USA, Canada, UAE, and Pakistan. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the South Asian Association of Physiologists (SAAP) Bulletin, Colombo, Sri Lanka and Chairman of the SAAP Research and Publication Subcommittee. He is also Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Windsor, Berkshire, UK. He is on the Peer-review Panel of 16 medical journals from India, UK, USA, Poland, The Netherlands, China, Indonesia, and Nigeria. He is Vice President, Physiological Society of India, Elected Member, Infectious Disease Society of America (Arlington, Virginia), Elected Member, American Society of Clinical Oncology (Alexandria, Virginia), Member, Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (London) and a Fellow of the Royal Society for Public Health (London). He has received 16 awards for his research work from India, New Zealand, UK, and USA.

View All Posts by Kaushik Bharati

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of their affiliated institutions, the Asian Council of Science Editors (ACSE), or the Editor’s Café editorial team.

Recent Articles

Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Scientific Publishing Capacity in the Arab World
Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Scientific Publishing Capacity in the Arab World

Although the Arab region has witnessed a noticeable rise in scientific activity over the past decades, its visibility ...

Read more ⟶

Who Owns Our Knowledge? An Answer from Indonesia’s Open Access (R)evolution
Who Owns Our Knowledge? An Answer from Indonesia’s Open Access (R)evolution

“Who owns our knowledge ?” The question feels especially relevant in Indonesia, where the answer...

Read more ⟶

World Brain Scholar joins ACSE as Corporate Member
World Brain Scholar joins ACSE as Corporate Member

The Asian Council of Science Editors (ACSE) is delighted to welcome World Brain Scholar as its newest corporate member. In ...

Read more ⟶